Airbus claims the A350 is 25 percent more fuel-efficient than comparable planes.
The A350, which was delayed for two years as Airbus hashed out a new design, is a competitor to the 787 – minus the lithium ion batteries now under investigation for unexplained smoldering. Airbus abandoned its plans to use the lithium ion batteries despite their advantages in weight, power and re-charging speed.
“The A350 has the same innovations more or less as the Dreamliner, the 787,” said Feldzer. “The same amount or proportion of carbon for the lightness of the material, just as many electrical devices.”
Boeing’s list prices for its 787 line range from $206 million to $243 million. Airbus lists prices ranging from $254 million to $332 million, and had 613 orders as of May, compared with 890 orders for the 787. Steep discounts are common on large orders, although the details are rarely made public.
The initial A350 program was scrapped and redesigned after customers criticized it. Development of the plane was held up by management disputes and financial troubles at Airbus early on.
But Boeing faced its own delays and problems with the 787, and analysts say Airbus is now trying to position itself as the airplane manufacturer that can get the job done.
“Boeing has the broader product line but they are still struggling under the shadows of the 787 nightmare and they seem unenthusiastic about launching new products,” said Richard Aboulafia, an analyst with the Teal Group. “Airbus has its chance to show themselves as the opposite of that.”
It was nearly two years after Boeing’s first flight of the 787 until the first passengers stepped onboard the jet.<< previous 1 2 3 4 next >>
Comments are closed